[
  {
    "record": 3,
    "software": "Ableton Live",
    "operation": "Trim and arrange generated video",
    "X": "1",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 0,
    "S": 0,
    "U": 0,
    "J": 0,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 33,
    "software": "Blender",
    "operation": "Rigid Body Constraint Simulation",
    "X": "1",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 0,
    "S": 0,
    "U": 0,
    "J": 0,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 38,
    "software": "Blender (addon, Video Sequence Editor)",
    "operation": "Pallaidium FLUX.2 Klein Image Generation",
    "X": "0.094",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 5,
    "U": 5,
    "J": 4,
    "P (parameters)": 7039253027,
    "C (computation)": 76699169.67619048,
    "p": 0.897,
    "c": 0.86,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Reference configuration, X to two decimal places: Pallaidium (Blender VSE add-on) FLUX.2 Klein 4B text to image through diffusers Flux2KleinPipeline at Pallaidium's default 1920 × 896, 4 steps, guidance 1.0, 512 text positions, reference images and LoRA unused.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 194,
    "software": "Krita with krita-ai-diffusion",
    "operation": "Generate an image from text",
    "X": "0.094",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 5,
    "U": 5,
    "J": 4,
    "P (parameters)": 7039253027,
    "C (computation)": 73256731.0,
    "p": 0.897,
    "c": 0.858,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Reference configuration, X to two decimal places: Krita AI Diffusion FLUX.2 Klein 4B generate (text to image) on an empty 1024 × 1024 canvas at 100% strength, selection, editing and reference off; Flux 2 Klein style (4 steps, CFG 1.0); 512 Qwen positions as approved for 192.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 357,
    "software": "TouchDesigner",
    "operation": "MediaPipe Segmentation and Video Cutout",
    "X": "0.772",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 2,
    "U": 0,
    "J": 3,
    "P (parameters)": 4070284,
    "C (computation)": 4559.982222222222,
    "p": 0.239,
    "c": 0.006,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Whether each class output contributes to the cutout remains a separate numerical-evidence question.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 390,
    "software": "Adobe Photoshop",
    "operation": "Magic Wand — color-based selection",
    "X": "1",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 0,
    "S": 0,
    "U": 0,
    "J": 0,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 400,
    "software": "ComfyUI",
    "operation": "Composite images with a mask",
    "X": "1",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 0,
    "S": 0,
    "U": 0,
    "J": 0,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 16,
    "software": "Autodesk Arnold",
    "operation": "Open Image Denoise Pass",
    "X": "0.587",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 2,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 2,
    "J": 2,
    "P (parameters)": 4758694,
    "C (computation)": 431265.06666666665,
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Conditional on Arnold albedo prefiltering and High quality. Arnold Open Image Denoise, colour plus albedo, High quality with learned albedo prefiltering, one OIDN subdevice and sufficient memory; 1920×1080 returned-image reference (equivalent padding factor at 960×540).",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 30,
    "software": "Blender",
    "operation": "Cycles Open Image Denoise Pass",
    "X": "0.509",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 2,
    "J": 2,
    "P (parameters)": 11531337,
    "C (computation)": 929587.2,
    "p": 0.431,
    "c": 0.466,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Stated CPU reference configuration: Blender 5.2 Cycles, OIDN 2.5.0, CPU, High quality, Accurate prefilter, Albedo and Normal, 1920×1080, one OIDN subdevice and sufficient memory, default weights.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 54,
    "software": "chaiNNer",
    "operation": "ESRGAN image upscaling chain",
    "X": "0.45",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 4,
    "J": 1,
    "P (parameters)": 16697987,
    "C (computation)": 1120428,
    "p": 0.5,
    "c": 0.5,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Reference configuration, X to two decimal places: Official GAN-trained RRDB_ESRGAN_x4.pth checkpoint, RRDBNet with 64 features and 23 RRDB blocks, native 4× enlargement, RGB-only input, Custom Scale off and the whole image processed as one tile.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 62,
    "software": "ComfyUI",
    "operation": "SD3.5 Large Image to Image",
    "X": "0.115",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 5,
    "U": 4,
    "J": 4,
    "P (parameters)": 13720478179,
    "C (computation)": 572623556.1757812,
    "p": 0.906,
    "c": 0.9,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Reference configuration, X to two decimal places: ComfyUI, SD3.5 Large (sd3.5_large_fp8_scaled): Load Image → VAE Encode → KSampler → VAE Decode → Save Image; 1024 × 1024 source; reference settings selected for this record: denoise 0.87, Euler sampler, simple scheduler, 20 steps, CFG 8.0 (KSampler defaults apart from denoise; ComfyUI's template index lists no SD3.5 image-to-image template, and the denoise value comes from ComfyUI's image-to-image example, whose own workflow runs SD1.5 with dpmpp_2m and the normal scheduler); empty negative prompt encoded; mask, ControlNet and added conditioning unused. X holds for denoise above 0 and at most 20/21 under these settings. At 0.87 the weight on the encoded source in the starting latent is 0.032 (1 − first sigma, calculated from ComfyUI's schedule code at SD3 shift 3.0); it describes the starting mixture, and how much of the source remains in the returned image is unmeasured. Above 20/21 the source leaves the starting latent.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 63,
    "software": "ComfyUI",
    "operation": "SD3.5 Large Masked Latent Inpainting",
    "X": "0.115",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 2,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 5,
    "J": 4,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Conditional on source size and settings.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 64,
    "software": "ComfyUI",
    "operation": "SD3.5 Large Text to Image",
    "X": "0.082",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 5,
    "U": 5,
    "J": 4,
    "P (parameters)": 13686203971,
    "C (computation)": 570295364.1757812,
    "p": 0.906,
    "c": 0.9,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Reference configuration, X to two decimal places: Official sd3.5_simple_example workflow: SD3.5 Large, 1024×1024, 20 Euler steps, sgm_uniform scheduler, CFG 4.01, batch size one, high-level semantic prompt and empty/noise latent, with the image area and its layout left to the model. Fixed comparison workload: 77 CLIP positions and 77 T5 positions, making 154 joint context positions, for positive and empty-negative conditioning.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 65,
    "software": "ComfyUI",
    "operation": "SD3.5 Large ControlNet Canny Generation",
    "X": "0.112",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 5,
    "U": 4,
    "J": 4,
    "P (parameters)": 15873997155,
    "C (computation)": 1370919581.7988281,
    "p": 0.908,
    "c": 0.911,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Reference configuration, X to two decimal places: ComfyUI official template sd3.5_large_canny_controlnet_example: supplied image → conventional Canny (0.3, 0.6) → SD3.5 Large Canny ControlNet, strength 0.66, active 0–100% → KSampler 32 steps, CFG 4.5, euler, simple, from an empty 1024 × 1024 latent → VAE Decode; negative = ConditioningZeroOut of the positive.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 66,
    "software": "ComfyUI",
    "operation": "SD3.5 Large ControlNet Depth Generation",
    "X": "0.113",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 5,
    "U": 4,
    "J": 4,
    "P (parameters)": 15873997155,
    "C (computation)": 862046384.7519531,
    "p": 0.908,
    "c": 0.906,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Reference configuration, X to two decimal places: ComfyUI, SD3.5 Large with the Depth ControlNet; depth map supplied by the person; official template sd3.5_large_depth sampling settings: strength 0.7, KSampler 20 steps, CFG 8, euler, normal, 1024 × 1024; negative = ConditioningZeroOut. The template's Lotus Depth estimator is outside this record's scope.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 104,
    "software": "Foundry Nuke",
    "operation": "Cattery MiDaS Depth Estimation",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Deployed model identity and inference configuration still to be established. Nuke Cattery MiDaS depth estimation from an RGB image; the deployed .cat model identity and gizmo resizing/inference dimensions are still to be verified.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 123,
    "software": "Grasshopper + LunchBox plugin",
    "operation": "LunchBoxML LightGBM Surface Regression",
    "X": "0.767",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 2,
    "U": 3,
    "J": 2,
    "P (parameters)": 2025,
    "C (computation)": 0,
    "p": 0.0,
    "c": 0.0,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Reference configuration, X to two decimal places: Vendor XY-to-Z nonlinear surface example: 96 stored training points; LightGBM trainer wired with a maximum of 5 leaves, 225 iterations, a minimum of 11 examples per leaf and learning rate 0.246; fit and predict heights at supplied XY locations, then plot the surface.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 124,
    "software": "gsplat",
    "operation": "Fit a Gaussian scene to photographs",
    "X": "0.496",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 2,
    "J": 3,
    "P (parameters)": 344560000,
    "C (computation)": 0,
    "p": 0.816,
    "c": 0.0,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Reference configuration, X to two decimal places: Garden Mip-NeRF 360 scene; simple_trainer default strategy at commit 6acdce49bd210fc611996a71bb8ac8c4aa895044, data factor 4, 30,000 optimization steps, degree-3 spherical harmonics, app_opt=False, with the appearance MLP and postprocessing model off; assess the fitted representation and subsequent novel-view rendering.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 175,
    "software": "Invoke",
    "operation": "FLUX.2 Klein regional generation on Canvas",
    "X": "0.161",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 4,
    "J": 4,
    "P (parameters)": 7073678883,
    "C (computation)": 75777211.0,
    "p": 0.897,
    "c": 0.859,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Reference configuration, X to two decimal places: Invoke Canvas, FLUX.2 Klein 4B regional generation in a person-drawn inpaint mask on an existing 1024 × 1024 canvas, default denoising strength 75%, 4 steps (redensified), CFG 1.0, 512 text positions; control layers and reference images unused.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 192,
    "software": "Krita with krita-ai-diffusion",
    "operation": "FLUX.2 Klein selected-region image editing",
    "X": "0.123",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 5,
    "J": 4,
    "P (parameters)": 7073678883,
    "C (computation)": 155471579,
    "p": 0.897,
    "c": 0.877,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Reference configuration, X to two decimal places: FLUX.2 Klein 4B Fill at 100% strength, Edit mode off, one person-made regional selection with a protected complement, a single 1024×1024 generation pass, four evaluations at CFG 1.0, one canvas reference latent and 512 Qwen context positions; Klein 4B outpaint/inpaint LoRA merged, with the automatic upscale/refine second pass off.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 193,
    "software": "Krita with krita-ai-diffusion",
    "operation": "Live painting generation preview",
    "X": "0.129",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 5,
    "U": 4,
    "J": 4,
    "P (parameters)": 7073678883,
    "C (computation)": 58983736.25,
    "p": 0.897,
    "c": 0.852,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Reference configuration, X to two decimal places: Krita AI Diffusion live painting with FLUX.2 Klein 4B on a whole 1024 × 1024 canvas, default live strength 0.3, selection, editing and reference layers off; Flux 2 Klein style (live steps 4, CFG 1.0), minimum 3 steps, so a 10-step schedule starts at step 7: 3 evaluations.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 279,
    "software": "Real-ESRGAN",
    "operation": "RealESR General x4v3 image upscaling",
    "X": "0.655",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 2,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 4,
    "J": 1,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Conditional on latitude.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 314,
    "software": "SideFX Houdini",
    "operation": "Generate terrain detail from a painted heightfield",
    "X": "0.372",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 2,
    "R": 1,
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Conditional on computation per output height sample.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 327,
    "software": "Stable Diffusion WebUI Forge",
    "operation": "SD3.5 Large text-to-image output",
    "X": "0.083",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 2,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 5,
    "U": 5,
    "J": 4,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Conditional on resolution and T5 setting.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 350,
    "software": "Topaz Video",
    "operation": "Deinterlace — Dione DV",
    "X": "0.496",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 4,
    "J": 2,
    "P (parameters)": 17520942,
    "C (computation)": 177543.0,
    "p": 0.509,
    "c": 0.175,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Reference configuration: Dione DV ddv-3/v3s, Core ML in Topaz Video AI 7.1.5; interlaced input, field order matched to the footage, Add Noise 0, 2× spatial enlargement and other filters off; one 672×576 input block yields one 1344×1152 progressive RGB output frame per processed block, with zero crop or padding overhead; memory usage 100%.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 351,
    "software": "Topaz Video",
    "operation": "Frame Interpolation — Apollo",
    "X": "0.423",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 2,
    "J": 2,
    "P (parameters)": 123706020,
    "C (computation)": 1041066.8571428572,
    "p": 0.754,
    "c": 0.487,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Reference configuration: Apollo apo-8 / Core ML apo-v8; inspected Topaz Video AI 7.1.5 cache, byte-identical to the inspected Topaz Video 1.0.1 cache; 2× frame-rate conversion at unchanged playback speed, Slow Motion None, Replace Duplicate Frames off and other filters off; one interior interval with four context frames, each 672×576, computes eight fixed output slots and retains two full 672×576 RGB frames; memory usage 100%.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 352,
    "software": "Topaz Video",
    "operation": "Motion Deblur — Themis",
    "X": "0.456",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 2,
    "J": 2,
    "P (parameters)": 21482885,
    "C (computation)": 1638304,
    "p": 0.544,
    "c": 0.565,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Reference configuration: Topaz Video AI 7.1.5, Core ML Themis 2; one 672-wide × 576-high interior reference frame; Motion Deblur on, other filters off, 100% admitted memory and one matching processing block. The recurring prior output supplies history from the earlier invocation.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 371,
    "software": "Unreal Engine",
    "operation": "NNE Intel Open Image Denoise Spatial Pass",
    "X": "0.645",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 2,
    "J": 2,
    "P (parameters)": 1833859,
    "C (computation)": 247447.46666666667,
    "p": 0.131,
    "c": 0.224,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "X 0.645 for the inspected UE 5.7 default RGB-and-alpha frame at 1920×1080. The RGB-channel X 0.682 is a separate, narrower assessed result that excludes alpha from both P and C. The reference covers the installed UE 5.7; UE 5.8 equivalence and live-render measurement are outside it.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 375,
    "software": "Upscayl",
    "operation": "RealESRGAN AnimeVideo v3 still-image upscale",
    "X": "0.673",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 4,
    "J": 1,
    "P (parameters)": 621424,
    "C (computation)": 47479.166666666664,
    "p": 0.05,
    "c": 0.056,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "X 0.673 at S4/U4/J1 for the declared Upscayl 2.15.0 custom-model route. U4 is a reasoned inference from the maker’s model-specific method account; exact v3 training objectives are still to be verified. Conditional U2 gives 0.74, a separate hypothesis from the recommended 0.673.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 382,
    "software": "waifu2x in nunif",
    "operation": "SwinUNet image upscaling",
    "X": "0.618",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 2,
    "J": 2,
    "P (parameters)": 3758304,
    "C (computation)": 265842.028125,
    "p": 0.227,
    "c": 0.235,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "X 0.618 for the declared Art 2× hub reference: 45 overlapping 256×256 tiles, augmentation off. The earlier approximately 0.627 is a separate large-tile-limit calculation; its different C leaves the delegated-determination ratings as assessed.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 36,
    "software": "Blender through StableGen",
    "operation": "FLUX.2 Klein Texturing and Projection",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "The operation returns a textured mesh, and how to count computation for 3D results is still an open decision.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 115,
    "software": "Autodesk Fusion",
    "operation": "Sketch AutoConstrain",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 2,
    "U": 3,
    "J": 3,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "X is still to be established: Autodesk has yet to publish the deployed model's parameter count, and the method still needs a computation basis for constraint and dimension output.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 355,
    "software": "Topaz Video",
    "operation": "Stabilization — Full Frame",
    "X": "0.421",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 2,
    "J": 3,
    "P (parameters)": 119582840,
    "C (computation)": 548955.5476190476,
    "p": 0.752,
    "c": 0.365,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Reference configuration: Topaz Video AI 7.1.5, Core ML, cpe-2 with rolling-shutter correction on, Full Frame on, Reduce Jittery Motions off; 672-wide × 384-high interior reference frame for which border filling and refinement run; smoothness 6, window 64, canvas 2 × 2 and memory 100%.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 7,
    "software": "Adobe After Effects",
    "operation": "Content-Aware Fill Object mode on generated video",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": 0,
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "R = 1 supported for active fitted route; P and S/U/J still to be settled. After Effects 25.4.0 Content-Aware Fill, Object mode, inspected Apple Silicon route with active gain/bias patch reconstruction, supplied clip and transparent removal area.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 95,
    "software": "Autodesk Flame",
    "operation": "ML Depth Indoor or Outdoor",
    "X": "0.352",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 2,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 3,
    "U": 3,
    "J": 3,
    "P (parameters)": 334133441,
    "C (computation)": 1790113.835308642,
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Flame 2027.0.0-504 macOS bundled CoreML model with the CoreML route enabled, standalone ML Depth Indoor or ML Depth Outdoor Matchbox, one fresh [computed for this frame] successful [completes on the first attempt; path traced in the shipped code] 1920 x 1080 full-frame evaluation; one 1036 x 1036 model input; cache reuse, CPU fallback, re-evaluation and downstream image processing outside this count. Indoor and Outdoor are alternatives with equal independently counted P and M.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 278,
    "software": "Radiant Photo 2",
    "operation": "Automatic scene-based photo correction",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 2,
    "U": 3,
    "J": 3,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "S2/U3/J3 supported; exact contributing P and C still to be counted. Radiant Photo 2 automatic scene-based correction, inspected route including Dynamic global/local curve prediction and contributing scene, colour and face tools.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 336,
    "software": "Topaz Gigapixel",
    "operation": "Face Recovery 3 with Strength Adjustment",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 4,
    "J": 3,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Coordinate for the whole enlarged image still to be established. Gigapixel Face Recovery 3 at nonzero strength with selected faces and a core upscaling model; endpoint is the entire enlarged image including the recovered faces.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 96,
    "software": "Autodesk Flame",
    "operation": "Normal Map → Face Analysis",
    "X": "0.549",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 2,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 3,
    "U": 3,
    "J": 3,
    "P (parameters)": 8047267,
    "C (computation)": 278300,
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Flame 2027.0.0-504 macOS bundled LL face model 4 on the declared MPS route/resource 2410247, Face Analysis on one supplied 384 × 384 RGB frame, ROI disabled/full frame, a fresh uncached [computed for this frame] first-success [completes on the first attempt; path traced in the shipped code] evaluation. One 1 × 3 × 384 × 384 graph input and one 384 × 384 returned RGB normal map; failure retries, cached reuse, downstream grading and relighting outside this count.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 281,
    "software": "RealityScan by Epic Games",
    "operation": "AI mask generation",
    "X": "0.439",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 2,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 2,
    "U": 3,
    "J": 3,
    "P (parameters)": 220154396,
    "C (computation)": 611230.3881481482,
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "X 0.439 for RealityScan 2.2.0.119430.RS with its identified bundled model: one 1920 × 1080 photograph and returned mask, first-success [the first inference attempt completes] path. Separately updated models and fallback/recovery are outside this reference.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 98,
    "software": "Autodesk Flame",
    "operation": "Timewarp → Machine Learning (2026)",
    "X": "0.645",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 2,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 2,
    "J": 2,
    "P (parameters)": 5360472,
    "C (computation)": 55834.17037037037,
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Autodesk Flame 2027.0.0-504, macOS Core ML execution path, Machine Learning (2026). A progressive Front pair of 1920 × 1080 frames supplies one uncached [new to Flame’s midpoint cache] exact midpoint. Matte input/output, strobe, interlacing, motion-blur supersampling, retry and recovery are outside this reference. The Core ML execution path is the assessed route, whichever backend Flame uses by default.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 26,
    "software": "Beautiful.ai",
    "operation": "Face-aware Photo Grid cropping of a supplied image",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 2,
    "U": 0,
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "X for the intended face-aware route is still to be completed. Preserve the fallback’s recorded 1 separately; 0.829 [X for the face-aware detector route] remains conditional on its proposed counting basis.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 50,
    "software": "Capture One Pro",
    "operation": "Subject mask",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 2,
    "U": 3,
    "J": 3,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Retain S2/U3/J3; include detection and refinement | Conditional 0.519 [X when the first decoder query passes the coverage test, over an assumed 1920 × 1080 mask] illustration; still to be settled overall",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 141,
    "software": "Higgsfield",
    "operation": "Relight image",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 3,
    "J": 3,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "S4/U3/J3 leads; S3 remains consequential | 0.667 − (p+c)/4",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 144,
    "software": "Higgsfield",
    "operation": "Face Swap image",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 3,
    "U": 4,
    "J": 3,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "S3/U4/J3 is strongest | 0.667 − (p+c)/4",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 154,
    "software": "Higgsfield",
    "operation": "Reframe video",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 5,
    "J": 4,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "S4/U5/J4 leads; retain scope and temporal qualifications | 0.567 − (p+c)/4",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 129,
    "software": "Higgsfield",
    "operation": "Soul 2.0",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 5,
    "U": 5,
    "J": 4,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "5/5/4, for semantic instructions, with the arrangement left to the model | 0.533 − (p+c)/4",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 151,
    "software": "Higgsfield",
    "operation": "Sync Lipsync",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 3,
    "U": 4,
    "J": 5,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "3/4/5, conditional on the labelled Sync 3 route | 0.6 − (p+c)/4",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 177,
    "software": "Jitter",
    "operation": "Image-to-video",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 5,
    "J": 5,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "4/5/5, where the image supplies starting context and the software determines subsequent motion | 0.533 − (p+c)/4",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 199,
    "software": "LookX",
    "operation": "Image-to-video",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 5,
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "S5 leading; U4/U5 and J4/J5 still to be settled | Depends on those findings",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 270,
    "software": "Adobe Premiere Pro",
    "operation": "Generative Extend, video only",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 5,
    "J": 5,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "4/5/5, with current-model continuity qualified | 0.533 − (p+c)/4",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 106,
    "software": "Foundry Nuke",
    "operation": "CopyCat matte",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 2,
    "U": 0,
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "0.653 [X from the recovered RGB Large checkpoint’s counts] remains conditional. The recovered 6,881,251-parameter checkpoint is RGB Large; the matte count analytically changes its output. The Medium matte model in use, its complete computation and J are still to be established.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 370,
    "software": "Unreal Engine",
    "operation": "Neural Morph",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 2,
    "U": 0,
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "46,091 imported vertices corrects the earlier render-vertex count. 52,411,515 parameters and approximately 0.698 depend on the proposed 63-bone, dense representation. The trained asset, active representation, coordination and vertex denominator are still to be settled.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 312,
    "software": "SideFX Houdini",
    "operation": "Neural Point Surface",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 2,
    "J": 1,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "162,321 parameters and 962,679,200 MACs per block reproduce for that architecture. 0.716 [X at the conditional voxel basis and S/U/J 4/2/1] remains conditional on the shipped Balanced model matching it, actual block processing and an adopted voxel denominator.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 17,
    "software": "Autodesk Arnold",
    "operation": "Rendering with denoiser disabled",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": "",
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "X awaits a specified scene; with the denoiser off, R depends on the scene’s shader pipeline. A scene whose implementation evidence shows specified computation determining the result would return X = 1.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 280,
    "software": "Apple Object Capture",
    "operation": "Photogrammetry reconstruction",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "≤0.623 [highest X at the assumed profile and parameter minimum, before C is counted] remains a conditional ceiling. Its assumed profile and contributing-parameter minimum are still to be verified. The bound holds whatever C turns out to be; it still needs the minimum of actively contributing parameters, beyond identifying the stored models.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 221,
    "software": "Meshroom",
    "operation": "Photogrammetry reconstruction",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "The full-graph 1 justification is unsupported. R1 is supported; U2/U3, contributing counts and the mesh denominator are still to be settled. Metashape provides a comparison; identical ratings would need evidence from Meshroom itself.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 29,
    "software": "Blender",
    "operation": "Correlation Tracking with Editable Markers",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 2,
    "U": 0,
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "0.9 [X at J1, with P = 4 and C = 0 as stated; J0 gives 0.933] is conditional, rather than a completed whole-operation coordinate.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 20,
    "software": "Autodesk AutoCAD",
    "operation": "2027 Smart Blocks Detect and Convert",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 2,
    "U": 3,
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Both expressions are conditional; J is still to be settled.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 373,
    "software": "Unreal Engine MetaHuman",
    "operation": "TrueDepth Performance facial solve with an existing Identity",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "≤0.487 [earlier parameter-only ceiling] is superseded: the corrected count gives about 0.488 at 4/3/3 and about 0.555 at the recommended S2/U3/J3, both with C left out.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 113,
    "software": "Autodesk Fusion",
    "operation": "Generative Design Outcome to Editable Solid",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": "",
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "1 requires a justified R0 configuration. X for the current operation is still to be established.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 128,
    "software": "Higgsfield",
    "operation": "Nano Banana Pro masked image editing",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "The expressions remain conditional on the editing task and effective source protection.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 6,
    "software": "Affinity by Canva",
    "operation": "Object Selection in the Unified App",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 2,
    "U": 0,
    "J": 3,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Limited to conditional calculations: X 0.526 for package 2.6 / InferenceMode 0, or X 0.621 for package 3.2.2 / nonzero InferenceMode, in unified Affinity 3.3.1.4940 Windows ARM64. Both use one fresh [the first prediction on the image, made before the encoder’s output is cached] unmodified point prediction and a proposed 1920×1080 returned-selection-mask basis. That operation-specific denominator is still a proposal, so the record appears in the List rather than on the map.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 97,
    "software": "Autodesk Flame",
    "operation": "ML Sky Extraction Active Selective",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 2,
    "U": 0,
    "J": 3,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Conditional X 0.783 at R1/S2/U0/J3 for the identified Flame 2027.0.0-504 Mac Sky model and one successful [run in Autodesk’s native inference library, which returned success] graph evaluation, using a proposed 1920×1080 returned-mask reference. The operation-specific mask-pixel basis is still a proposal, so the record appears in the List rather than on the map.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 107,
    "software": "Foundry Nuke (NukeX)",
    "operation": "Deblur",
    "X": "0.519",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 2,
    "J": 2,
    "P (parameters)": 6881251,
    "C (computation)": 1283592.177777778,
    "p": 0.332,
    "c": 0.524,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "X 0.519 for inspected Nuke 17.0v2 Mac arm64, FnDeblurLarge.cat, one whole-image 1920×1080 RGB input, mask unused and mix 1. This reference covers Nuke 17.0v2 whole-image processing; Nuke 17.1v2, tiled processing and other configurations are separate.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 139,
    "software": "Higgsfield",
    "operation": "Layers Remove Background on generated imagery",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 2,
    "U": 3,
    "J": 3,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "X is still to be established. R1/S2/U3/J3 gives X = 0.733 − (p+c)/4. The server checkpoint, contributing P and executed neural work need the deployed model itself, beyond its provider’s name.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 335,
    "software": "Topaz Gigapixel",
    "operation": "Core Upscale — Standard 2",
    "X": "0.359",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 2,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 4,
    "J": 2,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Conditional scoped reference: X 0.359 throughout the bounded 2× calculation for Gigapixel 1.4.0 local CoreML Standard 2, fresh [its 144 blocks still to be filled] 1024×1024 input. The same input at 4× gives X 0.388–0.389. Unpublished training flags for noise buffers and the shared correction kernel remain bounded qualifications.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 108,
    "software": "Foundry Nuke (NukeX)",
    "operation": "Nuke AIR Upscale",
    "X": "0.52",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 2,
    "J": 2,
    "P (parameters)": 6881251,
    "C (computation)": 1274154,
    "p": 0.332,
    "c": 0.523,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "X 0.52 for Nuke 17.0v2 Mac arm64, default FnUpscaleACESLarge.cat, Tile Size None and 1920×1080→3840×2160. U2 is a source-grounded methodological inference; the checkpoint’s exact losses and 17.1v2 equivalence are still to be verified.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 109,
    "software": "Foundry Nuke (NukeX)",
    "operation": "SmartVector paint propagation",
    "X": "0.859",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 2,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 2,
    "U": 0,
    "J": 2,
    "P (parameters)": 373248,
    "C (computation)": 0,
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "0.859 — conditional calculation for the inspected Nuke 17.0v2 adjacent-frame HD example, using one directed field and the R1 interpretation. The R assessment remains disputed; catalogue workload adoption and equivalence with 17.1v2 remain unestablished.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 183,
    "software": "KeyShot Studio",
    "operation": "KeyShot conventional rendering",
    "X": "1",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 0,
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "1 — equation result for the declared CPU, basic Diffuse and Basic-lighting reference, with Denoise/Firefly off and AI Shots unused. | 1 follows from the equation’s R0 branch; the software can still determine substantial aspects of the result.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 181,
    "software": "KeyShot Studio",
    "operation": "KeyShot Background",
    "X": "0.079",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 5,
    "U": 5,
    "J": 4,
    "P (parameters)": 28738475363,
    "C (computation)": 686940440.875,
    "p": 0.915,
    "c": 0.903,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "KeyShot's layer compositing after generation is untraced. If it places the rendered product back over the generated picture, S is 4 and X is 0.112. Some execution details come from upstream stable-diffusion.cpp code (commit 545fac4, 25 March 2026, from the period KeyShot's build matches): how the reference picture joins the image tokens, the vision encoder's attention, the 64-token prompt template and the VAE convolutions.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 182,
    "software": "KeyShot Studio",
    "operation": "KeyShot Imagine",
    "X": "0.079",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 5,
    "U": 5,
    "J": 4,
    "P (parameters)": 28591904099,
    "C (computation)": 683449349.875,
    "p": 0.915,
    "c": 0.902,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Some execution details come from upstream stable-diffusion.cpp code (commit 545fac4, 25 March 2026, from the period KeyShot's build matches): how the reference picture joins the image tokens, the vision encoder's attention, the 64-token prompt template and the VAE convolutions.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 184,
    "software": "KeyShot Studio",
    "operation": "KeyShot Replace",
    "X": "0.079",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 5,
    "U": 5,
    "J": 4,
    "P (parameters)": 28738475363,
    "C (computation)": 686940440.875,
    "p": 0.915,
    "c": 0.903,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "KeyShot's layer compositing after generation is untraced. If it places the unpainted area of the original back over the generated picture, S is 4 and X is 0.112. Some execution details come from upstream stable-diffusion.cpp code (commit 545fac4, 25 March 2026, from the period KeyShot's build matches): how the reference picture joins the image tokens, the vision encoder's attention, the 64-token prompt template and the VAE convolutions.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 185,
    "software": "KeyShot Studio",
    "operation": "KeyShot Restyle",
    "X": "0.112",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 5,
    "U": 4,
    "J": 4,
    "P (parameters)": 28738475363,
    "C (computation)": 686940440.875,
    "p": 0.915,
    "c": 0.903,
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Some execution details come from upstream stable-diffusion.cpp code (commit 545fac4, 25 March 2026, from the period KeyShot's build matches): how the reference picture joins the image tokens, the vision encoder's attention, the 64-token prompt template and the VAE convolutions.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 293,
    "software": "Rhino 8 / Grasshopper",
    "operation": "Galapagos conventional search",
    "X": "1",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 2,
    "R": 0,
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "1 [X under R0] — conditional on implementation evidence that the definition’s specifications and specified computation determine the result. | 1 follows from the equation’s R0 branch; the software can still determine substantial aspects of the result.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 217,
    "software": "Maxon ZBrush",
    "operation": "ZRemesher retopology",
    "X": "1",
    "status on the page": "X is calculated for the configuration and conditions stated here",
    "status code in the map data": 1,
    "R": 0,
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "1 — scoped equation result for conventional retopology on the supplied prescribed geometry; the proprietary implementation qualification remains. | 1 follows from the equation’s R0 branch; the software can still determine substantial aspects of the result.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 380,
    "software": "Veras in supported CAD hosts",
    "operation": "Veras V7 / V7 Flash viewport-guided generation",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 5,
    "U": 4,
    "J": 4,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "X still to be established — 0.567 − (p+c)/4 [X once P and C are counted], with S/U/J 5/4/4. V7 and V7 Flash require separate quantities.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 387,
    "software": "Google Nano Banana Pro",
    "operation": "Gemini 3 Pro Image API new-image generation",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 5,
    "U": 5,
    "J": 4,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "X still to be established — 0.533 − (p+c)/4 [X once P and C are counted], with S/U/J 5/5/4, for the API reference, with the arrangement left to the model.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 122,
    "software": "Google Slides",
    "operation": "Google Slides — Help me visualize > Image",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 5,
    "U": 5,
    "J": 4,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "X still to be established — 0.533 − (p+c)/4 [X once P and C are counted], with S/U/J 5/5/4. Slides requires its own quantities; equality with the API route is unestablished.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 56,
    "software": "ChatGPT",
    "operation": "ChatGPT image generation A / B",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 5,
    "U": 5,
    "J": 4,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "X still to be established — 0.533 − (p+c)/4 [X once P and C are counted], with S/U/J 5/5/4, separately for the A and B routes.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 265,
    "software": "Polycam",
    "operation": "Polycam Space Mode LiDAR-to-mesh reconstruction",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 4,
    "U": 2,
    "J": 3,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "X still to be established — 0.7 − (p+c)/4 [X once P and C are counted], with S/U/J 4/2/3, for the documented globally optimized reference. Active counts and an adopted mesh computation basis remain missing.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 219,
    "software": "Autodesk Maya",
    "operation": "Maya ML Deformer raw-Delta rig surrogate",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": 2,
    "U": 0,
    "J": 3,
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "X still to be established — 0.833 − (p+c)/4 [X once P and C are counted], with S/U/J 2/0/3, for the raw-Delta rig surrogate. The actual graph, active outputs and mesh computation basis remain required.",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 121,
    "software": "Google Flow",
    "operation": "Veo 3.1 video generation",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": "",
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Actual contributing parameters and executed neural work remain missing.\n\n5/5/5 remains supported for asset-reference generation without a supplied structural guide. Google’s API rules support Claude’s camera-control deduction for that API configuration.\n\nRetain 0.5 − (p+c)/4. Flow’s actual prompt-rewriting route remains unverified; API documentation alone does not establish it. P/C remain missing. Google schema.\n\nSupplied structure can arrive in text, photographs or motion media. U4 requires evidence that the mechanism uses the prescribed arrangement, pose, trajectory or event order. It requires neither a depth map nor a sketch. Conversely, uploading a reference does not automatically establish structural guidance.\n\nSeparate prompt-stage accounting does not automatically exclude that stage. For 121, 146 and 300, a rewriter contributing inside the declared operation needs its own counts. A generation-only assessment can exclude separately assessed rewriting when that boundary is stated. Cinema Studio’s enhance_prompt:true establishes a requested setting, not proven LLM execution.\n\nGoogle’s current Flow help establishes notification when a feature is unsupported, rather than the automatic switch Claude describes. Current Flow help.",
    "assessment": "**5/5/5 remains supported** for asset-reference generation without a supplied structural guide. Google’s API rules support Claude’s camera-control deduction for that API configuration.\n\nRetain **0.5 − (p+c)/4**. Flow’s actual prompt-rewriting route remains unverified; API documentation alone does not establish it. P/C remain missing. [Google schema](https://docs.cloud.google.com/gemini-enterprise-agent-platform/reference/rest/Shared.Types/VideoGenerationModelInstance).",
    "qualifications": "**Supplied structure can arrive in text, photographs or motion media.** U4 requires evidence that the mechanism uses the prescribed arrangement, pose, trajectory or event order. It requires neither a depth map nor a sketch. Conversely, uploading a reference does not automatically establish structural guidance.\n\n**Separate prompt-stage accounting does not automatically exclude that stage.** For 121, 146 and 300, a rewriter contributing inside the declared operation needs its own counts. A generation-only assessment can exclude separately assessed rewriting when that boundary is stated. Cinema Studio’s `enhance_prompt:true` establishes a requested setting, not proven LLM execution.\n\nGoogle’s current Flow help establishes notification when a feature is unsupported, rather than the automatic switch Claude describes. [Current Flow help](https://support.google.com/flow/answer/16352836?hl=en).",
    "assessed operation": "Given a text prompt that says how the ingredients are used, reference images added as ingredients in the standard Flow prompt box, the model set to Veo 3.1 Fast in Ingredients to Video (8 s), and the person's aspect ratio and number of outputs, Veo 3.1 Fast generates the frames, motion, viewpoint and audio of a new clip that carries the referenced subjects' appearance, and returns one or more new 8-second clips with generated audio in the Flow project.",
    "source links": "https://docs.cloud.google.com/gemini-enterprise-agent-platform/reference/rest/Shared.Types/VideoGenerationModelInstance\nhttps://support.google.com/flow/answer/16352836?hl=en",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 130,
    "software": "Higgsfield / Kling AI",
    "operation": "Kling 3.0 Motion Control performance transfer",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": "",
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Actual contributing parameters and executed neural work remain missing.\n\n5/4/5 remains supported for ordinary motion transfer with scene control off. The supplied performance guides movement, expression and timing while the model generates their visual realization.\n\nRetain 0.533 − (p+c)/4. Identify Standard versus Pro before counting: the website cites Pro, while Claude uses Standard. The technical report also contains a prompt-enhancement branch whose deployment needs checking. Higgsfield guide.\n\nKling’s largest-person selection rule does not establish that detecting those people is entirely programmed.",
    "assessment": "**5/4/5 remains supported** for ordinary motion transfer with scene control off. The supplied performance guides movement, expression and timing while the model generates their visual realization.\n\nRetain **0.533 − (p+c)/4**. Identify Standard versus Pro before counting: the website cites Pro, while Claude uses Standard. The technical report also contains a prompt-enhancement branch whose deployment needs checking. [Higgsfield guide](https://higgsfield.ai/creator-hub/help-center/ai-models/how-do-i-use-kling).",
    "qualifications": "Kling’s largest-person selection rule does not establish that detecting those people is entirely programmed.",
    "assessed operation": "Given a character image and a motion reference video of 3 to 30 s, with the prompt empty, character orientation matching the video and the original sound kept (the defaults in the Y configuration), Kling 3.0 Motion Control takes body, face and hand motion from the person in the video (from the person with the largest screen proportion when two or more appear), generates frames in which the character from the image performs that motion with the video's orientation and camera movement, and returns a clip whose length follows the motion reference.",
    "source links": "https://higgsfield.ai/creator-hub/help-center/ai-models/how-do-i-use-kling",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 146,
    "software": "Higgsfield",
    "operation": "Cinema Studio 4.0 temporal extension",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": "",
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Actual contributing parameters and executed neural work remain missing.\n\nHiggsfield’s returned-file boundary remains unresolved. ByteDance does show a separate five-second output and a separate source-plus-extension splice. That establishes the maker example, rather than Higgsfield’s final download.\n\nFor simple continuation: 5/5/5 → 0.5 − (p+c)/4 if the returned result is generated-only; 4/5/5 → 0.533 − (p+c)/4 if it includes a protected original interval. The client code cannot exclude a server-side splice. ByteDance guide.\n\nSupplied structure can arrive in text, photographs or motion media. U4 requires evidence that the mechanism uses the prescribed arrangement, pose, trajectory or event order. It requires neither a depth map nor a sketch. Conversely, uploading a reference does not automatically establish structural guidance.\n\nSeparate prompt-stage accounting does not automatically exclude that stage. For 121, 146 and 300, a rewriter contributing inside the declared operation needs its own counts. A generation-only assessment can exclude separately assessed rewriting when that boundary is stated. Cinema Studio’s enhance_prompt:true establishes a requested setting, not proven LLM execution.",
    "assessment": "**Higgsfield’s returned-file boundary remains unresolved.** ByteDance does show a separate five-second output and a separate source-plus-extension splice. That establishes the maker example, rather than Higgsfield’s final download.\n\nFor simple continuation: **5/5/5 → 0.5 − (p+c)/4** if the returned result is generated-only; **4/5/5 → 0.533 − (p+c)/4** if it includes a protected original interval. The client code cannot exclude a server-side splice. [ByteDance guide](https://docs.volcengine.com/docs/ark/seedance-2-5-prompt-guide?lang=zh).",
    "qualifications": "**Supplied structure can arrive in text, photographs or motion media.** U4 requires evidence that the mechanism uses the prescribed arrangement, pose, trajectory or event order. It requires neither a depth map nor a sketch. Conversely, uploading a reference does not automatically establish structural guidance.\n\n**Separate prompt-stage accounting does not automatically exclude that stage.** For 121, 146 and 300, a rewriter contributing inside the declared operation needs its own counts. A generation-only assessment can exclude separately assessed rewriting when that boundary is stated. Cinema Studio’s `enhance_prompt:true` establishes a requested setting, not proven LLM execution.",
    "assessed operation": "Given an uploaded clip of up to 30 seconds, a prompt and the person's choice of Forward or Backward Extend, Seedance 2.5 video-extend generates new seconds after the clip's last frame or before its first frame, determining their content, motion, camera path and look from the clip and prompt, and returns a video framed as the source; whether that video contains the uploaded frames, unchanged or regenerated, is still to be documented.",
    "source links": "https://docs.volcengine.com/docs/ark/seedance-2-5-prompt-guide?lang=zh",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 220,
    "software": "Autodesk Maya",
    "operation": "MotionMaker Guided Motion Generation",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": "",
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Actual contributing parameters and executed neural work remain missing.\n\nI recommend 2/4/5 instead of 5/4/5. It predicts joint transformations on the supplied rig. Your S2 rule explicitly covers coordinate/transformation fields governing supplied geometry. Writing every channel establishes the field’s extent, not S5.\n\nThe corrected proposal is 0.633 − (p+c)/4. The trajectory supports U4; dependent pose history supports J5. Model counts and an animation-curve computation basis remain open. Autodesk explanation.\n\nMotionMaker runs locally on the CPU, so “nine closed hosted models” is inaccurate.",
    "assessment": "**I recommend 2/4/5 instead of 5/4/5.** It predicts joint transformations on the supplied rig. Your S2 rule explicitly covers coordinate/transformation fields governing supplied geometry. Writing every channel establishes the field’s extent, not S5.\n\nThe corrected proposal is **0.633 − (p+c)/4**. The trajectory supports U4; dependent pose history supports J5. Model counts and an animation-curve computation basis remain open. [Autodesk explanation](https://blogs.autodesk.com/media-and-entertainment/2025/10/15/ai-powered-motionmaker-for-animation-your-top-questions-answered/).",
    "qualifications": "MotionMaker runs locally on the CPU, so “nine closed hosted models” is inaccurate.",
    "assessed operation": "Given a MotionMaker standard character, a keyed path locator, any character keys before the generated range, action tags on the Editor timeline, the enabled action styles and the generator settings (Path Follow Mode, Motion Scale, Auto Speed Ramp, Foot Slide Reduction, snap limits), the MotionMaker generator predicts the character's pose frame by frame from the preceding second of animation and the path information, applies the person's path-follow and contact settings, and returns the generated motion baked as keyframes on the character's joints.",
    "source links": "https://blogs.autodesk.com/media-and-entertainment/2025/10/15/ai-powered-motionmaker-for-animation-your-top-questions-answered/",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 232,
    "software": "Midjourney",
    "operation": "V8.2 Edit Model Whole Image Restyling",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": "",
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Actual contributing parameters and executed neural work remain missing.\n\nI recommend 4/4/3 for this specifically scoped restyle: S4 for reconstructing the supplied scene, U4 for its supplied arrangement, and J3 for integrating that scene.\n\nThis gives 0.633 − (p+c)/4. Whole-frame regeneration does not itself require S5; S4’s reconstruction branch does not require pixel copying. The current guide includes a directly relevant room-to-pencil-sketch example. Creating a new composition would require separate assessment. Midjourney guide.\n\nSupplied structure can arrive in text, photographs or motion media. U4 requires evidence that the mechanism uses the prescribed arrangement, pose, trajectory or event order. It requires neither a depth map nor a sketch. Conversely, uploading a reference does not automatically establish structural guidance.",
    "assessment": "**I recommend 4/4/3 for this specifically scoped restyle:** S4 for reconstructing the supplied scene, U4 for its supplied arrangement, and J3 for integrating that scene.\n\nThis gives **0.633 − (p+c)/4**. Whole-frame regeneration does not itself require S5; S4’s reconstruction branch does not require pixel copying. The current guide includes a directly relevant room-to-pencil-sketch example. Creating a new composition would require separate assessment. [Midjourney guide](https://docs.midjourney.com/hc/en-us/articles/48495453462797-Edit-Model).",
    "qualifications": "**Supplied structure can arrive in text, photographs or motion media.** U4 requires evidence that the mechanism uses the prescribed arrangement, pose, trajectory or event order. It requires neither a depth map nor a sketch. Conversely, uploading a reference does not automatically establish structural guidance.",
    "assessed operation": "Given one image and a prompt naming a style (Imagine bar with the image attached, or the Editor with nothing erased), with optional style references, moodboards and personalization, the V8.2 Edit model regenerates the whole image in the requested style and returns new images; whether the source's layout and shapes are carried by a structure-estimation step, as in the 2024 Retexture mode, or left to the edit model's own conditioning is still to be documented.",
    "source links": "https://docs.midjourney.com/hc/en-us/articles/48495453462797-Edit-Model",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 266,
    "software": "Polycam",
    "operation": "Object Mode Photogrammetric Mesh",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Actual contributing parameters and executed neural work remain missing.\n\nR1/S4 is supported through the fitted-scene rule. 4/2/3 is supported with masking off by Polycam’s documented fidelity target. 4/3/3 remains conditional on a contributing learned or fitted mask choosing unmarked objects.\n\nThe expressions are 0.7 − (p+c)/4 and 0.667 − (p+c)/4. Apple deployment, active contributors, fitted scene state and the mesh computation basis remain unverified. Polycam’s account.\n\nPolycam’s ≤0.623 remains conditional. The saved recount excludes 256 compiled nonlearned slots, giving a component subtotal of 2,635,926, rather than 2,636,182. The rounded ceiling remains 0.623. Both counted networks must actually contribute for that minimum to apply; stored graphs do not establish activation.",
    "assessment": "**R1/S4 is supported** through the fitted-scene rule. **4/2/3 is supported with masking off** by Polycam’s documented fidelity target. **4/3/3 remains conditional** on a contributing learned or fitted mask choosing unmarked objects.\n\nThe expressions are **0.7 − (p+c)/4** and **0.667 − (p+c)/4**. Apple deployment, active contributors, fitted scene state and the mesh computation basis remain unverified. [Polycam’s account](https://poly.cam/blog/lidar-vs-photogrammetry-which-3d-scanning-method-is-right-for-you).",
    "qualifications": "**Polycam’s ≤0.623 remains conditional.** The saved recount excludes 256 compiled nonlearned slots, giving a component subtotal of **2,635,926**, rather than 2,636,182. The rounded ceiling remains 0.623. Both counted networks must actually contribute for that minimum to apply; stored graphs do not establish activation.",
    "assessed operation": "Given 20 or more overlapping photos of an object (captured in Object Mode or uploaded, or frames Polycam extracts from an uploaded video), the person's photogrammetry quality level and the Object Masking setting (Isolate object from environment on the upload route), Polycam's cloud photogrammetry pipeline finds matching points between images to calculate depth and camera position, reconstructs the object's surface and returns a polygonal mesh with texture maps whose set follows the quality level (ambient occlusion and normal maps at Optimized and Medium, a roughness map added at Full, no PBR maps at Raw); with Object Masking on, an automatic identification of the subject in each photo decides which image regions the reconstruction treats as the object.",
    "source links": "https://poly.cam/blog/lidar-vs-photogrammetry-which-3d-scanning-method-is-right-for-you",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 271,
    "software": "Adobe Premiere",
    "operation": "Premiere Text-Based Editing",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": 1,
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Actual contributing parameters and executed neural work remain missing.\n\nRetain R1 for the website’s scope, which expressly includes transcription and time alignment. Programmed frame snapping and deletion still use those learned alignments.\n\nX=1 can describe deletion of a supplied, already aligned transcript. It cannot replace this record without changing its boundary. Claude’s Delete versus Delete (Ripple) correction is useful. Adobe workflow.\n\nPremiere’s installed SpeechESL manifest identifies components and timing settings, providing a concrete contributor trace, although the inspected encrypted models supply no immediate parameter count.",
    "assessment": "**Retain R1 for the website’s scope**, which expressly includes transcription and time alignment. Programmed frame snapping and deletion still use those learned alignments.\n\n**X=1** can describe deletion of a supplied, already aligned transcript. It cannot replace this record without changing its boundary. Claude’s Delete versus Delete (Ripple) correction is useful. [Adobe workflow](https://helpx.adobe.com/premiere/desktop/edit-projects/edit-video-using-text-based-editing/overview-of-text-based-editing.html).",
    "qualifications": "Premiere’s installed SpeechESL manifest identifies components and timing settings, providing a concrete contributor trace, although the inspected encrypted models supply no immediate parameter count.",
    "assessed operation": "Premiere Text Based Editing includes learned transcription and time alignment, with those alignments retained in edit boundaries.",
    "source links": "https://helpx.adobe.com/premiere/desktop/edit-projects/edit-video-using-text-based-editing/overview-of-text-based-editing.html",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 299,
    "software": "Runway",
    "operation": "Aleph 2.0 / Edit Studio",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": "",
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Actual contributing parameters and executed neural work remain missing.\n\nWhole-video scene editing: 5/4/5. Proper temporal subrange: 4/4/5. New Runway documentation explicitly establishes that the remaining clip is returned unchanged.\n\nRetain 0.533 − (p+c)/4 or 0.567 − (p+c)/4. Your website includes the Gen-4 Image frame-edit stage, so its contributing counts belong in the assessment. A range covering the entire clip has no protected complement. Runway developer guide, 22 October.",
    "assessment": "**Whole-video scene editing: 5/4/5. Proper temporal subrange: 4/4/5.** New Runway documentation explicitly establishes that the remaining clip is returned unchanged.\n\nRetain **0.533 − (p+c)/4** or **0.567 − (p+c)/4**. Your website includes the Gen-4 Image frame-edit stage, so its contributing counts belong in the assessment. A range covering the entire clip has no protected complement. [Runway developer guide, 22 October](https://dev.runway.com/learn/edit-and-finish-video-api).",
    "qualifications": "",
    "assessed operation": "Runway Edit Studio edits a reference frame with Gen-4 Image and produces revised footage through Aleph 2.0.",
    "source links": "https://dev.runway.com/learn/edit-and-finish-video-api",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 300,
    "software": "Runway",
    "operation": "Gen-4 Image reference-conditioned synthesis",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": "",
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Actual contributing parameters and executed neural work remain missing.\n\n5/5/4 fits identity/style-led new composition; 5/4/4 fits effective supplied structural guidance. U4 is not limited to sketches.\n\nRetain 0.533 − (p+c)/4 or 0.567 − (p+c)/4 with the configuration stated. Runway documents ordinary photographs supplying scene structure. The broad website entry needs that distinction. Runway examples.\n\nSupplied structure can arrive in text, photographs or motion media. U4 requires evidence that the mechanism uses the prescribed arrangement, pose, trajectory or event order. It requires neither a depth map nor a sketch. Conversely, uploading a reference does not automatically establish structural guidance.\n\nSeparate prompt-stage accounting does not automatically exclude that stage. For 121, 146 and 300, a rewriter contributing inside the declared operation needs its own counts. A generation-only assessment can exclude separately assessed rewriting when that boundary is stated. Cinema Studio’s enhance_prompt:true establishes a requested setting, not proven LLM execution.",
    "assessment": "**5/5/4** fits identity/style-led new composition; **5/4/4** fits effective supplied structural guidance. **U4 is not limited to sketches.**\n\nRetain **0.533 − (p+c)/4** or **0.567 − (p+c)/4** with the configuration stated. Runway documents ordinary photographs supplying scene structure. The broad website entry needs that distinction. [Runway examples](https://help.runwayml.com/hc/en-us/articles/41170686463635-Advanced-References-Use-Cases).",
    "qualifications": "**Supplied structure can arrive in text, photographs or motion media.** U4 requires evidence that the mechanism uses the prescribed arrangement, pose, trajectory or event order. It requires neither a depth map nor a sketch. Conversely, uploading a reference does not automatically establish structural guidance.\n\n**Separate prompt-stage accounting does not automatically exclude that stage.** For 121, 146 and 300, a rewriter contributing inside the declared operation needs its own counts. A generation-only assessment can exclude separately assessed rewriting when that boundary is stated. Cinema Studio’s `enhance_prompt:true` establishes a requested setting, not proven LLM execution.",
    "assessed operation": "Given one to three reference images loaded in the References panel, a prompt that says how to use them, and the person's aspect ratio, quantity (one or four), resolution, aesthetic range and seed, Gen-4 Image generates new images whose arrangement, pose, viewpoint, lighting and rendering it determines while carrying the characters, objects, locations or styles taken from the references, and returns one or four new images in the session.",
    "source links": "https://help.runwayml.com/hc/en-us/articles/41170686463635-Advanced-References-Use-Cases",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 385,
    "software": "Zapier MCP / OpenAI",
    "operation": "Generate An Image",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": "",
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "",
    "C (computation)": "",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Actual contributing parameters and executed neural work remain missing.\n\n5/5/4 fits generation without an explicit structural guide; 5/4/4 fits effective supplied positions, poses or ordering, including in text. Claude acknowledges that alternative, then incorrectly dismisses it.\n\nThe expressions are 0.533 − (p+c)/4 and 0.567 − (p+c)/4. The retirement dates check out, but OpenAI availability does not establish Zapier’s supported choices. Its selected model and endpoint remain unverified. An absent revised_prompt field does not prove that no prompt processing occurred. OpenAI schema.\n\nSupplied structure can arrive in text, photographs or motion media. U4 requires evidence that the mechanism uses the prescribed arrangement, pose, trajectory or event order. It requires neither a depth map nor a sketch. Conversely, uploading a reference does not automatically establish structural guidance.\n\nOpenAI explicitly documents prompt revision on its Responses image-tool route, making Zapier’s unknown endpoint consequential. OpenAI generation guide.",
    "assessment": "**5/5/4** fits generation without an explicit structural guide; **5/4/4** fits effective supplied positions, poses or ordering, including in text. Claude acknowledges that alternative, then incorrectly dismisses it.\n\nThe expressions are **0.533 − (p+c)/4** and **0.567 − (p+c)/4**. The retirement dates check out, but OpenAI availability does not establish Zapier’s supported choices. Its selected model and endpoint remain unverified. An absent `revised_prompt` field does not prove that no prompt processing occurred. [OpenAI schema](https://developers.openai.com/api/reference/resources/images/methods/generate/).",
    "qualifications": "**Supplied structure can arrive in text, photographs or motion media.** U4 requires evidence that the mechanism uses the prescribed arrangement, pose, trajectory or event order. It requires neither a depth map nor a sketch. Conversely, uploading a reference does not automatically establish structural guidance.\n\nOpenAI explicitly documents prompt revision on its Responses image-tool route, making Zapier’s unknown endpoint consequential. [OpenAI generation guide](https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/image-generation).",
    "assessed operation": "Zapier MCP managed mode, ChatGPT (OpenAI) Generate An Image action, with the person's prompt and model field locked as tool values. Return the generated image to the MCP client. The backend OpenAI API route and deployed model stay open questions where Zapier’s documentation leaves them unnamed; other actions and upstream agent planning are outside.",
    "source links": "https://developers.openai.com/api/reference/resources/images/methods/generate/\nhttps://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/image-generation",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 37,
    "software": "Blender (addon)",
    "operation": "StableGen TRELLIS.2 supplied-image-to-mesh",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": "",
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "4,947,890,380",
    "C (computation)": "Unresolved",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "A computation basis for returned 3D results is still to be adopted.\n\nWith Background Removal set to Auto, StableGen invokes BiRefNet without Microsoft’s skip-if-transparent check. Shape generation is followed by programmed simplification and remeshing. The active simplification target remains to be distinguished between the 100,000-face property default and the 1,000,000-face MESH ONLY preset.\n\nProposed profile: 4/4/3, with 4/4/4 as an alternative. S4 follows reconstruction of the supplied object; U4 follows the documented generative reconstruction role. J3 records integration of that object. Whole-token attention alone does not establish J4’s synthesis of semantic and spatial relationships.\n\nFor the reviewed shape-only 1024 Cascade route, counted active P = 4,947,890,380, excluding 2,742 BiRefNet parameters used only during training. Conditional equation limits are 0.161–0.411 at 4/4/3 and 0.127–0.377 at 4/4/4. The reference workload estimate of approximately 7.46 × 10¹⁴ neural MACs uses assumed voxel growth, sparse-convolution work and reference token counts; it is not a measurement of executed work for a particular run.\n\nSources: StableGen workflow, TRELLIS.2 paper, BiRefNet model code.\n\nThese limits hold only for the stated parameter count and proposed profile, with c ranging from 0 to 1. They are equation limits, not estimated placements. A computation basis for returned 3D results is still to be adopted. Calculations using a hypothetical 1024 × 1024 view remain unadopted sensitivity cases.",
    "assessment": "Proposed profile: **4/4/3**, with **4/4/4** as an alternative. S4 follows reconstruction of the supplied object; U4 follows the documented generative reconstruction role. J3 records integration of that object. Whole-token attention alone does not establish J4’s synthesis of semantic and spatial relationships.\n\nFor the reviewed shape-only 1024 Cascade route, counted active **P = 4,947,890,380**, excluding 2,742 BiRefNet parameters used only during training. Conditional equation limits are **0.161–0.411** at 4/4/3 and **0.127–0.377** at 4/4/4. The reference workload estimate of approximately **7.46 × 10¹⁴ neural MACs** uses assumed voxel growth, sparse-convolution work and reference token counts; it is not a measurement of executed work for a particular run.",
    "qualifications": "These limits hold only for the stated parameter count and proposed profile, with c ranging from 0 to 1. They are equation limits, not estimated placements. A computation basis for returned 3D results is still to be adopted. Calculations using a hypothetical 1024 × 1024 view remain unadopted sensitivity cases.",
    "assessed operation": "StableGen TRELLIS.2, Generate From Image, with one supplied image, Texture Mode None, Resolution 1024 Cascade and Background Removal Auto. Retain the documented BiRefNet background-removal route and default server-side simplification and remeshing. Returned result: the untextured mesh imported into Blender. Prompt-to-image generation and textured outputs are outside.",
    "source links": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sakalond/StableGen/1d6e83fc966afc8b2c196c011b75ce7cdaa07c83/stablegen/mesh_gen/workflows.py\nhttps://arxiv.org/html/2512.14692v1\nhttps://huggingface.co/ZhengPeng7/BiRefNet/resolve/e2bf8e4460fc8fa32bba5ea4d94b3233d367b0e4/birefnet.py",
    "Processing stages": "With Background Removal set to Auto, StableGen invokes BiRefNet without Microsoft’s skip-if-transparent check. Shape generation is followed by programmed simplification and remeshing. The active simplification target remains to be distinguished between the 100,000-face property default and the 1,000,000-face MESH ONLY preset.",
    "Configuration": "",
    "Sources": "Sources: [StableGen workflow](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sakalond/StableGen/1d6e83fc966afc8b2c196c011b75ce7cdaa07c83/stablegen/mesh_gen/workflows.py), [TRELLIS.2 paper](https://arxiv.org/html/2512.14692v1), [BiRefNet model code](https://huggingface.co/ZhengPeng7/BiRefNet/resolve/e2bf8e4460fc8fa32bba5ea4d94b3233d367b0e4/birefnet.py).",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 259,
    "software": "Adobe Photoshop",
    "operation": "Sky Replacement with Editable Layer Output",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": "",
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "Unresolved",
    "C (computation)": "Unresolved",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Complete active P and C are still to be counted.\n\nProposed 2/0/3 applies to learned sky masking followed by conventional placement of the supplied sky; J2 remains an alternative. The complete operation remains conditional because Adobe also attributes blending to machine learning. Learned global adjustment settings could change U while S remains S2; learned reconstruction of an appearance channel could change S. Editable adjustment layers do not establish how their settings were obtained.\n\nComplete active P and C are still to be counted. The reported 0.612–0.799 interval depends on unverified weight precision, compression, container contents and execution assumptions, including an assumed 256 KiB allowance for non-weight data. It is retained as a hypothetical calculation, not an established technical bound. With 2/0/3 fixed and both counts unknown, the equation’s limits are 0.333–0.833.\n\nSources: Adobe workflow, Adobe’s masking and blending account, Core ML quantization.",
    "assessment": "Proposed **2/0/3** applies to learned sky masking followed by conventional placement of the supplied sky; **J2** remains an alternative. The complete operation remains conditional because Adobe also attributes blending to machine learning. Learned global adjustment settings could change U while S remains S2; learned reconstruction of an appearance channel could change S. Editable adjustment layers do not establish how their settings were obtained.\n\nComplete active **P and C remain unknown**. The reported **0.612–0.799** interval depends on unverified weight precision, compression, container contents and execution assumptions, including an assumed 256 KiB allowance for non-weight data. It is retained as a hypothetical calculation, not an established technical bound. With 2/0/3 fixed and both counts unknown, the equation’s limits are **0.333–0.833**.",
    "qualifications": "",
    "assessed operation": "Given an image with a sky and a preset or person-supplied sky image, Sky Replacement detects the sky region automatically, the person's Shift edge, Fade edge and Sky Brush settings adjust that mask, the chosen sky is scaled and positioned inside it, and lighting, edge-lighting and colour-harmonization adjustments are set on the foreground; the command returns a Sky Replacement layer group of the sky, its masks and adjustment layers.",
    "source links": "https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/desktop/effects-filters/artistic-stylize-filters/replace-the-sky-in-images.html\nhttps://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2020/10/20/photoshop-the-worlds-most-advanced-ai-application-for-creatives\nhttps://apple.github.io/coremltools/docs-guides/source/opt-quantization-overview.html",
    "Processing stages": "",
    "Configuration": "",
    "Sources": "Sources: [Adobe workflow](https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/desktop/effects-filters/artistic-stylize-filters/replace-the-sky-in-images.html), [Adobe’s masking and blending account](https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2020/10/20/photoshop-the-worlds-most-advanced-ai-application-for-creatives), [Core ML quantization](https://apple.github.io/coremltools/docs-guides/source/opt-quantization-overview.html).",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 263,
    "software": "Point-E",
    "operation": "Text to Point Cloud Research Example",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": "",
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "204,447,500",
    "C (computation)": "Unresolved",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "A computation basis for returned 3D results is still to be adopted.\n\nThe base model generates 1,024 coloured points from the text-conditioned sample. The upsampler adds 3,072 points conditioned on that generated cloud, with text conditioning disabled. The returned result combines both sets into one 4,096-point cloud.\n\nProposed profile: 5/5/4 for the notebook’s subject prompt. The person supplies the subject; the models construct the particular shape, point positions and colours. The subject prompt supplies no explicit structural guide. Text input alone does not establish U5 for every possible configuration.\n\nCounted active P = 204,447,500, excluding the fixed six-value buffer and 1,024 ineffective LayerNorm scale values. The declared workload totals 63,593,435,813,888 neural MACs per cloud. Conditional equation limits are 0.086–0.336.\n\nSources: Point-E notebook, sampler, model implementation.\n\nThese limits hold only for the stated parameter count and proposed profile, with c ranging from 0 to 1. They are equation limits, not estimated placements. A computation basis for returned 3D results is still to be adopted. Calculations using a hypothetical 1024 × 1024 view remain unadopted sensitivity cases.",
    "assessment": "Proposed profile: **5/5/4** for the notebook’s subject prompt. The person supplies the subject; the models construct the particular shape, point positions and colours. The subject prompt supplies no explicit structural guide. Text input alone does not establish U5 for every possible configuration.\n\nCounted active **P = 204,447,500**, excluding the fixed six-value buffer and 1,024 ineffective LayerNorm scale values. The declared workload totals **63,593,435,813,888 neural MACs per cloud**. Conditional equation limits are **0.086–0.336**.",
    "qualifications": "These limits hold only for the stated parameter count and proposed profile, with c ranging from 0 to 1. They are equation limits, not estimated placements. A computation basis for returned 3D results is still to be adopted. Calculations using a hypothetical 1024 × 1024 view remain unadopted sensitivity cases.",
    "assessed operation": "Given a text prompt, the text2pointcloud example encodes it with the CLIP ViT-L/14 text encoder, the base40M-textvec diffusion model generates 1,024 coloured points under guidance scale 3.0, and the upsample diffusion model generates 3,072 further points conditioned on that cloud rather than the text; the example returns the combined 4,096-point RGB point cloud.",
    "source links": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openai/point-e/main/point_e/examples/text2pointcloud.ipynb\nhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/openai/point-e/main/point_e/diffusion/sampler.py\nhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/openai/point-e/main/point_e/models/transformer.py",
    "Processing stages": "The base model generates 1,024 coloured points from the text-conditioned sample. The upsampler adds 3,072 points conditioned on that generated cloud, with text conditioning disabled. The returned result combines both sets into one 4,096-point cloud.",
    "Configuration": "",
    "Sources": "Sources: [Point-E notebook](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openai/point-e/main/point_e/examples/text2pointcloud.ipynb), [sampler](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openai/point-e/main/point_e/diffusion/sampler.py), [model implementation](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openai/point-e/main/point_e/models/transformer.py).",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 269,
    "software": "Adobe Premiere",
    "operation": "Auto Reframe",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": "",
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "Unresolved",
    "C (computation)": "Unresolved",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Complete active P and C are still to be counted.\n\nThe learned analysis predicts visual importance in each frame. Programmed smoothing, path optimization and keyframe generation turn those predictions into a moving crop over the supplied footage. These steps retain the predictions’ influence on the returned framing.\n\nProposed profile: 2/3/3, with 2/3/2 as an alternative. S2 concerns a transformation of supplied footage; U3 concerns selection of important action without a person-marked target or a category named by the operation. J3 per frame is a task-based interpretation. Programmed smoothing across frames does not establish learned temporal synthesis.\n\nComplete active P and C are still to be counted. The reported 0.673–0.713 interval depends on unverified storage, internal-layer and evaluation-frequency assumptions. It is retained as a hypothetical calculation. With 2/3/3 fixed and both counts unknown, the equation’s limits are 0.233–0.733; the J2 alternative gives 0.267–0.767.\n\nSources: Adobe Auto Reframe workflow, Adobe’s saliency and path-optimization account.",
    "assessment": "Proposed profile: **2/3/3**, with **2/3/2** as an alternative. S2 concerns a transformation of supplied footage; U3 concerns selection of important action without a person-marked target or a category named by the operation. J3 per frame is a task-based interpretation. Programmed smoothing across frames does not establish learned temporal synthesis.\n\nComplete active **P and C remain unknown**. The reported **0.673–0.713** interval depends on unverified storage, internal-layer and evaluation-frequency assumptions. It is retained as a hypothetical calculation. With 2/3/3 fixed and both counts unknown, the equation’s limits are **0.233–0.733**; the J2 alternative gives **0.267–0.767**.",
    "qualifications": "",
    "assessed operation": "Given a clip (or each clip of a sequence), a target aspect ratio and the person's Motion Tracking preset, Auto Reframe's Sensei analysis identifies the subject and action in each frame, an optimization computes a camera path that keeps that action inside the new frame, and Premiere returns the clip with generated motion keyframes, or a duplicate sequence at the new dimensions with the effect on each clip.",
    "source links": "https://helpx.adobe.com/premiere/desktop/add-video-effects/commonly-used-effects/add-auto-reframe-effect-to-a-clip.html\nhttps://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2018/11/14/projectsmoothoperator-brings-intelligent-automated-cropping-to-video-publishing",
    "Processing stages": "The learned analysis predicts visual importance in each frame. Programmed smoothing, path optimization and keyframe generation turn those predictions into a moving crop over the supplied footage. These steps retain the predictions’ influence on the returned framing.",
    "Configuration": "",
    "Sources": "Sources: [Adobe Auto Reframe workflow](https://helpx.adobe.com/premiere/desktop/add-video-effects/commonly-used-effects/add-auto-reframe-effect-to-a-clip.html), [Adobe’s saliency and path-optimization account](https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2018/11/14/projectsmoothoperator-brings-intelligent-automated-cropping-to-video-publishing).",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 304,
    "software": "Shap-E",
    "operation": "Text to Mesh Research Example",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": "",
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "664,354,494",
    "C (computation)": "Unresolved",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "A computation basis for returned 3D results is still to be adopted.\n\nProposed profile: 5/5/4 for the notebook’s subject prompt. Learned parameter projections and neural field queries determine the particular geometry and colours. Marching cubes converts those predictions into an explicit mesh and retains their influence. An effective supplied structural guide can be textual; the notebook’s subject prompt supplies none.\n\nCounted active P = 664,354,494. For the reviewed mesh endpoint, the analytical workload is 93,440,363,890,688 + 367,616V neural MACs per mesh, where V is the number of vertices queried for colour. Preview rendering is outside this endpoint. Conditional equation limits are 0.073–0.323.\n\nSources: Shap-E notebook, parameter projections, mesh renderer.\n\nThese limits hold only for the stated parameter count and proposed profile, with c ranging from 0 to 1. They are equation limits, not estimated placements. A computation basis for returned 3D results is still to be adopted. Calculations using a hypothetical 1024 × 1024 view remain unadopted sensitivity cases.",
    "assessment": "Proposed profile: **5/5/4** for the notebook’s subject prompt. Learned parameter projections and neural field queries determine the particular geometry and colours. Marching cubes converts those predictions into an explicit mesh and retains their influence. An effective supplied structural guide can be textual; the notebook’s subject prompt supplies none.\n\nCounted active **P = 664,354,494**. For the reviewed mesh endpoint, the analytical workload is **93,440,363,890,688 + 367,616V neural MACs per mesh**, where V is the number of vertices queried for colour. Preview rendering is outside this endpoint. Conditional equation limits are **0.073–0.323**.",
    "qualifications": "These limits hold only for the stated parameter count and proposed profile, with c ranging from 0 to 1. They are equation limits, not estimated placements. A computation basis for returned 3D results is still to be adopted. Calculations using a hypothetical 1024 × 1024 view remain unadopted sensitivity cases.",
    "assessed operation": "Given a text prompt and the example notebook's settings (batch size 4, guidance scale 15, 64 Karras steps), Shap-E's text300M diffusion model, conditioned on CLIP text features, samples a latent for each output; the transmitter's parameter projections turn the latent into the weights of an implicit function whose signed-distance and color fields the STF renderer evaluates on a grid, marching cubes extracts the surface, and the notebook returns one mesh with vertex colors per sample, written as PLY and OBJ.",
    "source links": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openai/shap-e/main/shap_e/examples/sample_text_to_3d.ipynb\nhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/openai/shap-e/main/shap_e/models/transmitter/params_proj.py\nhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/openai/shap-e/main/shap_e/models/stf/renderer.py",
    "Processing stages": "",
    "Configuration": "",
    "Sources": "Sources: [Shap-E notebook](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openai/shap-e/main/shap_e/examples/sample_text_to_3d.ipynb), [parameter projections](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openai/shap-e/main/shap_e/models/transmitter/params_proj.py), [mesh renderer](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openai/shap-e/main/shap_e/models/stf/renderer.py).",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 323,
    "software": "SPAR3D (Stable Point Aware 3D)",
    "operation": "Single Image to Mesh Neural Reconstruction",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": "",
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "Conditional",
    "C (computation)": "Unresolved",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "A computation basis for returned 3D results is still to be adopted.\n\nThe initial pass samples a point cloud, then combines it with image features to reconstruct the mesh. The reviewed implementation writes roughness and metallic as scalar factors; albedo and normal are textures. The shipped denoiser has 24 blocks. Opaque input invokes the InSPyReNet remover; input already containing transparency skips removal.\n\nProposed profile: 4/4/4. The supplied image identifies the observed object being reconstructed. Point sampling supplies plausible hidden geometry, supporting U4 and jointly synthesized shape relationships. The paper’s conflicting-cues experiment shows the visible surface following the image and the hidden surface following the point cloud. Noise prediction does not override S4’s observed-instance reconstruction branch.\n\nCounted active P = 1,976,139,319 with the identified remover and 1,885,417,876 when removal is skipped. Conditional equation limits are 0.131–0.381 and 0.132–0.382, respectively. For the reviewed opaque-input workload, the analytical count is 53,418,213,097,472 + 32,128T neural MACs, where T is the number of valid texture texels, at most 1,048,576 for the 1024 atlas. Skipping removal subtracts 782,424,883,200 MACs. Uploaded or edited point-cloud passes are outside this configuration.\n\nSources: SPAR3D paper, §4.5, implementation, pinned dependencies.\n\nThese limits hold only for the stated parameter count and proposed profile, with c ranging from 0 to 1. They are equation limits, not estimated placements. A computation basis for returned 3D results is still to be adopted. Calculations using a hypothetical 1024 × 1024 view remain unadopted sensitivity cases.",
    "assessment": "Proposed profile: **4/4/4**. The supplied image identifies the observed object being reconstructed. Point sampling supplies plausible hidden geometry, supporting U4 and jointly synthesized shape relationships. The paper’s conflicting-cues experiment shows the visible surface following the image and the hidden surface following the point cloud. Noise prediction does not override S4’s observed-instance reconstruction branch.\n\nCounted active **P = 1,976,139,319** with the identified remover and **1,885,417,876** when removal is skipped. Conditional equation limits are **0.131–0.381** and **0.132–0.382**, respectively. For the reviewed opaque-input workload, the analytical count is **53,418,213,097,472 + 32,128T neural MACs**, where T is the number of valid texture texels, at most 1,048,576 for the 1024 atlas. Skipping removal subtracts **782,424,883,200 MACs**. Uploaded or edited point-cloud passes are outside this configuration.",
    "qualifications": "These limits hold only for the stated parameter count and proposed profile, with c ranging from 0 to 1. They are equation limits, not estimated placements. A computation basis for returned 3D results is still to be adopted. Calculations using a hypothetical 1024 × 1024 view remain unadopted sensitivity cases.",
    "assessed operation": "SPAR3D run.py at the reviewed commit fdc311b, on one object image, foreground ratio 1.3, texture resolution 1024 and remesh none. Keep the actual background-removal branch: opaque input runs the remover; input with transparency skips it. Use the point-diffusion sample, followed by triplane prediction, mesh extraction and map baking. Return the textured GLB; point-cloud editing or upload is outside this configuration.",
    "source links": "https://arxiv.org/html/2501.04689v1\nhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/Stability-AI/stable-point-aware-3d/main/spar3d/system.py\nhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/Stability-AI/stable-point-aware-3d/main/requirements.txt",
    "Processing stages": "The initial pass samples a point cloud, then combines it with image features to reconstruct the mesh. The reviewed implementation writes roughness and metallic as scalar factors; albedo and normal are textures. The shipped denoiser has 24 blocks. Opaque input invokes the InSPyReNet remover; input already containing transparency skips removal.",
    "Configuration": "",
    "Sources": "Sources: [SPAR3D paper, §4.5](https://arxiv.org/html/2501.04689v1), [implementation](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Stability-AI/stable-point-aware-3d/main/spar3d/system.py), [pinned dependencies](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Stability-AI/stable-point-aware-3d/main/requirements.txt).",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 359,
    "software": "TouchDesigner",
    "operation": "NVIDIA Denoise TOP — Video Noise Removal",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": "",
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "Unresolved",
    "C (computation)": "Unresolved",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Complete active P and C are still to be counted for the reviewed Maxine 0.7.6 route.\n\nProposed S4/U2 applies to both Low and High Denoising strengths. The filter reconstructs cleaned observed footage under a detail-preservation target. Per-stream state establishes temporal dependence of the complete filter, but does not establish whether that dependence is learned. J2 and J1 remain conditional alternatives.\n\nComplete active P and C are still to be counted for the reviewed Maxine 0.7.6 route. The reported 0.681–0.733 interval relies on unverified package-storage assumptions and older timing data that predate the denoiser change and do not identify both strengths. With 4/2/2 fixed, the equation’s unknown-count limits are 0.233–0.733; at 4/2/1 they are 0.267–0.767. The narrower interval remains a hypothetical calculation.\n\nSources: TouchDesigner Denoise documentation, NVIDIA state documentation, SDK performance reference.",
    "assessment": "Proposed **S4/U2** applies to both Low and High Denoising strengths. The filter reconstructs cleaned observed footage under a detail-preservation target. Per-stream state establishes temporal dependence of the complete filter, but does not establish whether that dependence is learned. **J2 and J1 remain conditional alternatives.**\n\nComplete active **P and C remain unknown** for the reviewed Maxine 0.7.6 route. The reported **0.681–0.733** interval relies on unverified package-storage assumptions and older timing data that predate the denoiser change and do not identify both strengths. With 4/2/2 fixed, the equation’s unknown-count limits are **0.233–0.733**; at 4/2/1 they are **0.267–0.767**. The narrower interval remains a hypothetical calculation.",
    "qualifications": "",
    "assessed operation": "Given video frames 80–1920 by 80–1080 pixels and the person's Denoising mode and Low or High strength, the Maxine webcam denoise model removes low-light camera noise while preserving detail, tracking the stream with a per-stream state variable, and returns denoised frames at the input resolution.",
    "source links": "https://derivative.ca/UserGuide/NVIDIA_Denoise_TOP\nhttps://docs.nvidia.com/maxine/vfx/1.0.0/API/Architecture/CreateandSetStateVariables.html\nhttps://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/maxine/vfx-sdk-system-guide/index.html",
    "Processing stages": "",
    "Configuration": "",
    "Sources": "Sources: [TouchDesigner Denoise documentation](https://derivative.ca/UserGuide/NVIDIA_Denoise_TOP), [NVIDIA state documentation](https://docs.nvidia.com/maxine/vfx/1.0.0/API/Architecture/CreateandSetStateVariables.html), [SDK performance reference](https://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/maxine/vfx-sdk-system-guide/index.html).",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 360,
    "software": "TouchDesigner",
    "operation": "NVIDIA Upscaler TOP — Super-Resolution",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": "",
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "Unresolved",
    "C (computation)": "Unresolved",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "Complete active P and C are still to be counted.\n\nProposed S4/U2 applies to Super Res 2 with Artifact Reduction disabled. The model estimates higher-resolution samples of supplied footage under a content-preservation target. Increased sampling does not raise U under the fidelity-recovery rule. J1 versus J2 remains unresolved; model-file size does not establish the relationships resolved together.\n\nComplete active P and C are still to be counted. The reported 0.678–0.733 interval relies on unverified package-storage, benchmark-matching and resolution-scaling assumptions. With 4/2/2 fixed, the equation’s unknown-count limits are 0.233–0.733; at 4/2/1 they are 0.267–0.767. The narrower interval remains a hypothetical calculation.\n\nSources: TouchDesigner Upscaler documentation, NVIDIA SDK guide.",
    "assessment": "Proposed **S4/U2** applies to Super Res 2 with Artifact Reduction disabled. The model estimates higher-resolution samples of supplied footage under a content-preservation target. Increased sampling does not raise U under the fidelity-recovery rule. **J1 versus J2 remains unresolved**; model-file size does not establish the relationships resolved together.\n\nComplete active **P and C remain unknown**. The reported **0.678–0.733** interval relies on unverified package-storage, benchmark-matching and resolution-scaling assumptions. With 4/2/2 fixed, the equation’s unknown-count limits are **0.233–0.733**; at 4/2/1 they are **0.267–0.767**. The narrower interval remains a hypothetical calculation.",
    "qualifications": "",
    "assessed operation": "Given video frames 90–3840 by 90–2160 pixels and the person's Super Res 2 mode with Artifact Reduction off, the Maxine Super Resolution model doubles the resolution, enhancing and sharpening detail while preserving content, and returns the 2× frames.",
    "source links": "https://derivative.ca/UserGuide/NVIDIA_Upscaler_TOP\nhttps://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/maxine/vfx-sdk-programming-guide/index.html",
    "Processing stages": "",
    "Configuration": "",
    "Sources": "Sources: [TouchDesigner Upscaler documentation](https://derivative.ca/UserGuide/NVIDIA_Upscaler_TOP), [NVIDIA SDK guide](https://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/maxine/vfx-sdk-programming-guide/index.html).",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 364,
    "software": "TripoSR (open-source code)",
    "operation": "Single Image to Mesh Reconstruction",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": "",
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "Conditional",
    "C (computation)": "Unresolved",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "A computation basis for returned 3D results is still to be adopted.\n\nThe assessment covers reconstruction; separate background removal is outside it. A full run.py assessment includes its actual removal branch. These are separate boundaries and are retained separately.\n\nProposed profile: 4/2/3 for reconstruction from a prepared foreground image. Multiview reconstruction supervision supports the fidelity target; determinism and LPIPS alone do not establish U2. Including automatic selection of an unmarked salient object gives 4/3/3 when the remover runs.\n\nCounted active P = 418,685,036 for the core reconstruction, giving conditional equation limits 0.244–0.494. With u2net included, P = 462,694,905 and the limits are 0.209–0.459. For the separately specified RMBG-2.0 configuration, P = 638,839,432 and the limits are 0.207–0.457.\n\nThe Pillow dependency pin supports a compatible clean-install route using rembg 2.0.69 and its u2net default. It does not identify every existing installation or replace an explicitly specified newer RMBG-2.0 route. The core analytical workload retains its vertex-colour term: 2,162,798,118,912 + 40,704V neural MACs, where V is the number of vertices queried for colour.\n\nSources: TripoSR technical report, requirements, rembg 2.0.69 default.\n\nThese limits hold only for the stated parameter count and proposed profile, with c ranging from 0 to 1. They are equation limits, not estimated placements. A computation basis for returned 3D results is still to be adopted. Calculations using a hypothetical 1024 × 1024 view remain unadopted sensitivity cases.",
    "assessment": "Proposed profile: **4/2/3** for reconstruction from a prepared foreground image. Multiview reconstruction supervision supports the fidelity target; determinism and LPIPS alone do not establish U2. Including automatic selection of an unmarked salient object gives **4/3/3** when the remover runs.\n\nCounted active **P = 418,685,036** for the core reconstruction, giving conditional equation limits **0.244–0.494**. With u2net included, **P = 462,694,905** and the limits are **0.209–0.459**. For the separately specified RMBG-2.0 configuration, **P = 638,839,432** and the limits are **0.207–0.457**.\n\nThe Pillow dependency pin supports a compatible clean-install route using rembg 2.0.69 and its u2net default. It does not identify every existing installation or replace an explicitly specified newer RMBG-2.0 route. The core analytical workload retains its vertex-colour term: **2,162,798,118,912 + 40,704V neural MACs**, where V is the number of vertices queried for colour.",
    "qualifications": "These limits hold only for the stated parameter count and proposed profile, with c ranging from 0 to 1. They are equation limits, not estimated placements. A computation basis for returned 3D results is still to be adopted. Calculations using a hypothetical 1024 × 1024 view remain unadopted sensitivity cases.",
    "assessed operation": "The assessment covers reconstruction; separate background removal is outside it.",
    "source links": "https://arxiv.org/html/2403.02151\nhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/VAST-AI-Research/TripoSR/main/requirements.txt\nhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/danielgatis/rembg/v2.0.69/rembg/session_factory.py",
    "Processing stages": "",
    "Configuration": "The assessment covers reconstruction; separate background removal is outside it. A full run.py assessment includes its actual removal branch. These are separate boundaries and are retained separately.",
    "Sources": "Sources: [TripoSR technical report](https://arxiv.org/html/2403.02151), [requirements](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/VAST-AI-Research/TripoSR/main/requirements.txt), [rembg 2.0.69 default](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/danielgatis/rembg/v2.0.69/rembg/session_factory.py).",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  },
  {
    "record": 379,
    "software": "Veras in supported CAD hosts",
    "operation": "Generate 3D model with Microsoft TRELLIS 2.0",
    "X": "",
    "status on the page": "Assessment so far",
    "status code in the map data": 3,
    "R": "",
    "S": "",
    "U": "",
    "J": "",
    "P (parameters)": "Unresolved",
    "C (computation)": "Unresolved",
    "p": "",
    "c": "",
    "c worked back from X": "",
    "condition or missing evidence, as listed in the record": "The complete operation’s profile and contributing P and C are still to be settled.\n\nThe Veras web client inspected on 27 October 2026 describes rebuilding the selected crop as a clean product image and naming the object before mesh generation. The contributing models, their objectives and corresponding plug-in behaviour have not been established. The public TRELLIS pipeline does not establish Chaos’s hosted checkpoint, pipeline type, remover or effective quality settings.\n\nThe complete operation’s profile and contributing P and C are still to be settled. The reported 5/4/4 profile is retained as a conditional interpretation, not established for every contributing stage. The mesh computation basis also remains unadopted.\n\nFor the stated public checkpoints and 5/4/4 profile, the equation ceiling is approximately 0.343583 for the plain route and 0.342689 for cascade. These round to 0.344 and 0.343, respectively. Neither is a verified bound for the hosted product. The reported per-view ceiling of 0.122 also depends on an unverified workload and hosted configuration. None is adopted as this record’s coordinate.\n\nSources: Inspected Veras web-client bundle, Chaos’s Generate 3D documentation, public TRELLIS.2 pipeline.",
    "assessment": "The complete operation’s profile and contributing **P and C remain unresolved**. The reported **5/4/4** profile is retained as a conditional interpretation, not established for every contributing stage. The mesh computation basis also remains unadopted.\n\nFor the stated public checkpoints and 5/4/4 profile, the equation ceiling is approximately **0.343583** for the plain route and **0.342689** for cascade. These round to **0.344** and **0.343**, respectively. Neither is a verified bound for the hosted product. The reported per-view ceiling of **0.122** also depends on an unverified workload and hosted configuration. None is adopted as this record’s coordinate.",
    "qualifications": "",
    "assessed operation": "Veras Model tab, Generate 3D model, Microsoft TRELLIS 2.0 engine: take an already selected object crop from the Veras rendering, with Quality recorded, and return a PBR-textured mesh placed in the Veras 3D view. Detect objects or Lasso supplies the crop as a preceding task. Baking into the CAD host is later. The record gives a Veras release number where a source supports one.",
    "source links": "https://veras.evolvelab.io/assets/index-DRQ8nOgh.js\nhttps://docs-chaos.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/Veras/pages/1344962601\nhttps://github.com/microsoft/TRELLIS.2",
    "Processing stages": "The Veras web client inspected on 27 October 2026 describes rebuilding the selected crop as a clean product image and naming the object before mesh generation. The contributing models, their objectives and corresponding plug-in behaviour have not been established. The public TRELLIS pipeline does not establish Chaos’s hosted checkpoint, pipeline type, remover or effective quality settings.",
    "Configuration": "",
    "Sources": "Sources: [Inspected Veras web-client bundle](https://veras.evolvelab.io/assets/index-DRQ8nOgh.js), [Chaos’s Generate 3D documentation](https://docs-chaos.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/Veras/pages/1344962601), [public TRELLIS.2 pipeline](https://github.com/microsoft/TRELLIS.2).",
    "X coordinate units": "0–1",
    "X method": "irm-x-combined-20261015; 0–1 scale adopted 3 November 2026"
  }
]